- Python 72.2%
- HTML 16.7%
- OpenSCAD 5.5%
- JavaScript 4.9%
- Makefile 0.7%
| compliance | ||
| decisions | ||
| docs | ||
| dsp | ||
| hardware | ||
| marketing | ||
| mechanical | ||
| product | ||
| research | ||
| tools | ||
| validation | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
| LICENSE.md | ||
| Makefile | ||
| README.md | ||
| SAFETY.md | ||
| SECURITY.md | ||
The Thing
A batteryless, body-coupled voice channel for an overt, consent-based AI meeting system.
The wearer is passive. A reader puck supplies RF illumination, receives the wearer’s analog backscatter, records an explicitly indicated room channel, and performs all storage and computation. The contact channel identifies the wearer mechanically; the room channel captures everyone else.
This repository is an engineering dossier and staged prototype plan—not a claim that a production RF design has already been validated. Every important statement is labeled as one of:
- Demonstrated — supported by a cited primary source.
- Derived — ordinary engineering analysis from demonstrated facts.
- Hypothesis — must pass the named test before it becomes a requirement.
Start here
Open docs/index.html in a browser. It is the central, offline-readable atlas and links to every engineering deliverable.
Then follow this order:
docs/start-here.html— the shortest path from zero to a defensible prototype.SAFETY.md— neck-wear, RF, privacy, and test boundaries.validation/DVP.md— tests and pass/fail gates.hardware/wearer/README.mdandhardware/reader/README.md.mechanical/README.md— printable fit-check hardware and its limitations.
Product thesis
Conventional AI recorders put battery, microphones, storage, and trust on the body. The Thing moves all powered complexity into a visible desk puck. The choker has no battery, firmware, storage, network identity, or cloud credential. A user-operated mechanical mute physically opens the sensor path and detunes/shorts the tag.
The key commercial insight is two-channel capture:
- A throat-contact backscatter channel strongly favors the wearer.
- A conventional room microphone in the visible reader puck captures the meeting.
- Time alignment makes “me versus everyone else” substantially easier than blind speaker diarization.
Non-negotiable boundaries
- Do not test the 915 MHz → 515 MHz research topology over the air outside a shielded RF environment until a qualified compliance engineer approves the exact setup.
- Do not market, record, or retain anyone’s voice without the required notice and consent.
- Do not build a non-breakaway neck loop or a rigid ring.
- Do not treat paper dimensions as a production design. Body loading, manufacturing tolerance, and enclosure material change the RF behavior.
- Do not copy or sell a published architecture without a freedom-to-operate review and, where needed, a license.
Repository map
| Path | Purpose |
|---|---|
docs/ |
Offline HTML engineering atlas and diagrams |
hardware/wearer/ |
Passive tag reference topology, antenna notes, BOM |
hardware/reader/ |
Reader architecture, BOM, RF test boundary |
mechanical/ |
Parametric CAD, generated STL fit-check models |
dsp/ |
Auditable reference demodulation and alignment code |
validation/ |
Design verification plan and test logs |
compliance/ |
US/EU launch checklist and privacy gates |
product/ |
PRD, market wedge, roadmap, IP/FTO notes |
marketing/ |
Brand platform, campaigns, launch site, SVG art, GUI-only Blender sources |
research/ |
Source registry and evidence/claim ledger |
decisions/ |
Architecture decision records |
Current status
Documentation baseline and fit-check models. No RF design in this repository is certified, licensed, or production-validated. The next physical milestone is P0: wired throat-contact acquisition, followed by P1: shielded backscatter feasibility.
The public-story concept lives at marketing/site/index.html. Marketing claims remain subordinate to the engineering claim ledger and validation gates.
Licensing
No project license has been selected. See LICENSE.md. Do not assume permission to commercialize third-party research or patents merely because they are cited here.